Difference between MSTP and RSTP

MSTP (Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol) and RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol) are both enhanced versions of the original STP (Spanning Tree Protocol) designed to improve network stability, speed up convergence, and provide more efficient loop prevention in Ethernet networks. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct characteristics. Here’s a breakdown of the key differences between MSTP and RSTP:

---

1. Purpose and Functionality

• RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol):

  • RSTP is an evolution of the original IEEE 802.1D STP (Spanning Tree Protocol). Its primary goal is to improve the convergence time of STP.
  • Faster Convergence: RSTP significantly reduces the time required for the network to converge (after a topology change, such as a link failure). RSTP achieves convergence within seconds (typically 1–2 seconds), compared to STP which can take 30–50 seconds.
  • Backwards Compatibility: RSTP is backward compatible with legacy 802.1D STP devices. Devices that support RSTP can still operate in mixed networks with devices running the older STP.

• MSTP (Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol):

  • MSTP is an extension of RSTP that allows for the creation of multiple spanning tree instances (MSTIs) across the network. It is defined in IEEE 802.1s, which is an extension to the original 802.1Q (VLAN Tagging) standard.
  • Multiple VLANs in a Single STP Instance: MSTP allows multiple VLANs to be mapped to a single spanning tree instance, enabling more efficient use of network resources.
  • Optimized for VLAN-Based Networks: MSTP is particularly useful in large VLAN-based networks, as it allows for more granular control over which VLANs are assigned to different spanning tree instances.

---

2. Convergence Time

• RSTP:

  • Rapid Convergence: RSTP offers much faster convergence than the original STP by improving how switches transition between states.
  • Edge Port and Proposal/Agreement Mechanism: RSTP uses a proposal/agreement mechanism and edge port concept to speed up convergence. When a topology change happens, the network is able to quickly converge to a loop-free state.
  • Convergence Time: Typically within 1–3 seconds after a link failure.

• MSTP:

  • Convergence Based on RSTP: MSTP inherits the rapid convergence characteristics of RSTP. However, since MSTP deals with multiple spanning tree instances (each with its own topology), it may involve more complexity in determining the optimal path across those instances.
  • Convergence Time: The convergence time in MSTP is generally faster than legacy STP, but may vary depending on the number of MSTI regions and the network's overall design.

---

3. Spanning Tree Instances

• RSTP:
  • RSTP only uses a single spanning tree instance for the entire network, meaning one topology for all VLANs.
  • Every VLAN shares the same STP instance, which can lead to inefficiencies in networks with many VLANs.
• MSTP:
  • MSTP allows the creation of multiple spanning tree instances (MSTIs). Each MSTI can have its own topology and root bridge, which is particularly beneficial in multi-VLAN networks.
  • This means that different VLANs can have different spanning tree paths, which improves network resource utilization and load balancing by allowing more efficient use of redundant links across VLANs.

---

4. Compatibility with VLANs

• RSTP:
  • Single STP Instance: In RSTP, all VLANs share a single spanning tree, so the same topology is used for every VLAN. This can create inefficiencies in large VLAN environments because all VLANs will use the same set of paths, even if certain paths are more efficient for some VLANs than others.
• MSTP:
  • Multiple STP Instances: MSTP supports multiple spanning tree instances and allows administrators to assign specific VLANs to particular instances. This means each VLAN or group of VLANs can have its own spanning tree topology, optimizing the network’s performance and load balancing across different VLANs.
  • MSTP maps multiple VLANs to MSTI instances, allowing better use of redundant links and reducing the number of blocked ports for VLAN traffic.

---

5. Protocol Design

• RSTP:

  • RSTP enhances the original STP by introducing new port roles and states to enable quicker convergence.
    • Port Roles in RSTP:
      • Root Port (RP): The port on a non-root bridge that is closest to the root bridge.
      • Designated Port (DP): The port on a bridge that has the best path to a particular segment of the network.
      • Alternate Port: A backup port that can quickly take over if the active port fails.
    • Port States in RSTP: The states include Discarding, Learning, and Forwarding, but the transition times are significantly faster than in standard STP.

• MSTP:

  • MSTP uses the same rapid convergence mechanisms as RSTP but extends this functionality to work with multiple spanning tree instances (MSTIs).
  • MSTP creates MST regions, where multiple switches agree on the configuration of the multiple spanning tree instances (MSTI). A unique MSTP configuration is shared across switches in the same region.

---

6. Network Complexity

• RSTP:
  • Simpler Configuration: RSTP is simpler to configure because it uses a single spanning tree for the entire network. It doesn't require complex mappings between VLANs and spanning tree instances.
• MSTP:
  • More Complex: MSTP is more complex because it allows for multiple spanning tree instances and requires careful configuration of which VLANs map to which MSTI.
  • MSTI Regions: MSTP requires the network to be divided into MST regions, and the configuration must be consistent across all switches in the region to avoid misconfigurations.

---

7. Use Cases

• RSTP:

  • Best for smaller to mid-sized networks that don't have a high number of VLANs or complex topologies.
  • Suitable for networks where rapid convergence is needed but there is no significant need to separate VLANs into different spanning tree instances.

• MSTP:

  • Ideal for large VLAN-based networks that require more efficient use of redundant links and better load balancing across VLANs.
  • Large enterprise networks or data centers where multiple VLANs need to be handled with distinct STP topologies for improved efficiency.

---

Summary of Key Differences

Feature	RSTP (Rapid STP)	MSTP (Multiple STP)
Convergence Time	Faster than legacy STP (~1–3 seconds)	Faster than legacy STP, but slightly slower than RSTP due to MSTI calculation
Spanning Tree Instances	Single spanning tree for all VLANs	Multiple spanning tree instances (MSTIs) per VLAN or group of VLANs
VLAN Support	One STP instance for all VLANs	Different spanning tree topologies for different VLANs
Network Complexity	Simple to configure and manage	More complex due to MSTI region configuration and VLAN mappings
Load Balancing	No load balancing between VLANs	Allows load balancing between VLANs via MSTIs
Best Use Case	Small to medium-sized networks	Large, complex networks with many VLANs
Compatibility	Backward compatible with legacy STP	Backward compatible with RSTP, but requires MST region configuration